Skip to content
BOOSTD

Content Strategy

Content strategy services that tell you what to write, fix and drop

Content strategy services that give you a written plan: what to publish, which pages to fix, merge or remove, and which topics to skip.

No cost to ask. A person replies within one working day.Or get an instant free SEO auditSee pricingBook a free callCall 647-896-7674

BOOSTD Approvals screen for an example plumbing business: 4 changes waiting, including a rewrite of the Bradford boiler repair page and a new title for the plumbing page, each with how long it takes to review and a Review button, above the list of things the owner has said can always go ahead.
Approvals: nothing goes live on your website until you say yes.

In every planIncluded in Local or Growth, from $149 a month. Every plan has every feature; they differ by size.

Compare plans

How it works

How we build your content strategy in six steps

A content strategy is a set of decisions, not a list of articles. Step four is the one most teams skip.

  1. Map what people search for, and why

    The same search can mean early research, comparing options or ready to buy. Guess wrong and a well-written page is still useless.

    You get: A map of the searches that matter, sorted by what people want

  2. Audit what you already have

    Every page gets a decision: keep, update, merge or remove. Most quick wins are here, because older sites usually have several pages chasing the same search.

    You get: A keep, update, merge or remove decision for every page

  3. Group the topics

    One strong page covers the main question and supporting pages back it up without repeating it. Then we plan the links between them.

    You get: Topic groups and an internal linking plan

  4. Write the no-list

    Topics we won’t cover, and why: no chance of ranking, no link to sales, no in-house expert, or a page that already does the job. It’s what lets someone turn down an idea.

    You get: A written no-list with a reason for each topic

  5. Write briefs that give writers direction

    Each brief says why the piece exists, what question it answers, what it must say that ranking pages don’t and which expert we need to interview.

    You get: Briefs that each state why the piece exists

  6. Plan for pages going out of date

    Prices, tools and guidance change. A refresh schedule with clear warning signs stops your best pages slipping while everyone chases new work.

    You get: An update schedule and checks for slipping pages

The decision underneath

Should this article get written? Four questions

The no-list records the ideas that failed one of these questions, and why. Nobody has to reopen the debate three months later.

Four questions for a proposed article.
  1. Does this topic link to something you sell?

    Yes: Keep going. A link to sales is the first test, and most ideas fail it.

    No: No-list. Interesting to your industry isn’t the same as useful to your business.

  2. Does someone in your business know this subject?

    Yes: We book an interview. That’s what makes the piece worth reading.

    No: No-list. Without an expert, the piece can only repeat what already ranks.

  3. Do you already have a page for this?

    Yes: Then update it. The table below shows how we choose.

    No: Nothing on your site covers it, so a new piece is worth a look.

  4. Can you answer it better than the pages already ranking?

    Yes: Brief it, with the reason it exists written at the top.

    No: No-list, with the reason written down, so nobody argues it twice.

Update or write new

Update an existing page, or write a new one?

How we choose between improving an existing page and writing a new one
DimensionUpdate what existsWrite something new
When it appliesYou have a page for this need, and the gap can be fixedNothing on your site covers the search, or the current page serves a different need
What it costsUsually a fraction of a new piece, because the structure and links already existThe full cost: research, expert time, writing, editing, design and links from scratch
How fast it showsFaster. The page already has history, links and Google’s attentionSlower. A new page has to earn its place before you can judge it
The riskA careless rewrite can lose what was working, so we change things carefully and track themThe new page competes with one you already have, and both get weaker
What it needs from youUpdated facts, current prices or process details, and a short expert reviewA full interview, original material and time from someone who knows the subject

Quality over volume

Why publishing more won’t fix it

Lots of content shows effort, not progress. Sixty pages that deserve to exist will beat six hundred that mostly don’t.

To hit a volume target, briefs get thinner, expert interviews get skipped and pieces get stitched together from what already ranks. Nobody links to that or quotes it.

It also creates upkeep. Every page will go out of date one day, or compete with something newer. Publish faster than you can maintain, and the next budget goes on cleaning up the last one.

What you get

What your content strategy includes

A working document your team can use without us to make decisions in a Monday meeting.

  • A search map showing what people want for each group of searches
  • A page-by-page audit of your content, with a decision and a reason for each
  • Topic groups showing which page covers which need and how they link
  • The no-list: topics we’ve ruled out, and why
  • One ranked to-do list mixing updates and new pieces
  • Briefs for the first batch of content, each saying why the piece exists
  • An interview plan naming which experts we need for which pieces
  • An update calendar for the pages worth protecting
  • A way to measure content by enquiries and sales as well as visits

Questions

Common questions about content strategy

How is this different from a content calendar?

A calendar says when to publish. A content strategy says whether to publish at all: which topics deserve your effort, what each piece must do for sales and how your pages connect.

A quick test: can someone use the plan to turn down an idea? If not, it’s a schedule.

Will you recommend deleting content we paid for?

Sometimes, but merging is more common. If three thin pages answer the same question, one strong page with the others redirected usually beats all three.

We first show you what each page brings in today: traffic, links and enquiries. We only suggest removing pages that bring in nothing and can’t be improved.

How do you decide between refreshing a page and writing a new one?

We check if you already have a page for that search and how close it is to ranking well. If it’s close and the gap can be fixed, updating is cheaper, faster and more likely to work.

We write new when nothing on your site covers the search, or when the current page serves a different need and forcing the two together would help neither.

How much should we be publishing?

Less than most calendars assume, with more care in each piece. Volume targets produce pages that sum up what already ranks, and nobody links to or quotes those.

We plan around what your team can produce well, including your experts’ time. A slower pace that keeps quality beats a fast one that slips.

What do you need from our team?

Short recorded chats with people who know things, usually a salesperson, someone who delivers the service and one senior expert. No writing homework.

We also ask for your common objections, why you lose deals and the questions support hears again and again. That shows how your customers decide better than any keyword tool.

Are your pages competing with each other?

Most sites that have published for a few years have pages fighting over the same search. We look for those first, because merging them is usually the quickest win.

References

Sources for content strategy

The official documents and research this page is based on. Platform rules change, so check the source before you act on a detail.

  1. Google Search Central: creating helpful, reliable, people-first content

Last updated · Published by Zubair Afzal, responsible editor